Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.
(Wiley)
First round of reviews.
| Turnaround rate | 401 days (SD = 0) |
| Review length | 586 words (SD = 30) |
| Review quality | 5 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Overall quality | 5 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Would submit again | 5 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Journal recommendation | 5 / 5 (SD = 0) |
(based on 1 report including 2 reviews) |
|
Desk rejects. |
|
| Turnaround rate | n/a |
| Plausibility | n/a |
Reviewers & Editors (Initial Submissions)
| Reviewers | |
| Length | 586 words (SD = 30) |
| Overall tone | Positive (modal) |
| Knowledge | 4.5 / 5 (SD = 0.5) |
| Helpfulness | 5 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Fairness | 4.5 / 5 (SD = 0.5) |
| Overall quality | 5 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Editors | |
| Length | 218 words (SD = 0) |
| Decision | Major Revision (modal) |
| Plausibility | 5 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Helpfulness | 3 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Fairness | 5 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Overall quality | 4 / 5 (SD = 0) |
Reviewers & Editors (Successive Rounds)
| Turnaround rate | 34 days (SD = 0) |
(based on 1 report including 2 reviews) |
|
| Reviewers | |
| Length | 20 words (SD = 3) |
| Overall tone | Positive (modal) |
| Knowledge | 5 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Helpfulness | 5 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Fairness | 5 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Consistency | 5 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Overall quality | 5 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Editors | |
| Length | 130 words (SD = 0) |
| Decision | Accept (modal) |
| Plausibility | 5 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Helpfulness | 5 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Fairness | 5 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Overall quality | 5 / 5 (SD = 0) |
Comments
· Overall quality rating: 5 / 5 · Recommendation: 5 / 5
Very happy with the review process at this journal! The reviews arrived quickly and the two reviewers made helpful and constructive suggestions that substantially increased the quality of the paper. After implementing the comments the paper was accepted. The second review round was very fair: Once the reviewers saw that we had done everything to implement the comments, they were happy with the state of the manuscript and accepted it straight out. The editor followed their decision and accepted it without corrections. Overall, this seems to be a fair, good and well organized journal and I can recommend submitting your paper to it.
Very happy with the review process at this journal! The reviews arrived quickly and the two reviewers made helpful and constructive suggestions that substantially increased the quality of the paper. After implementing the comments the paper was accepted. The second review round was very fair: Once the reviewers saw that we had done everything to implement the comments, they were happy with the state of the manuscript and accepted it straight out. The editor followed their decision and accepted it without corrections. Overall, this seems to be a fair, good and well organized journal and I can recommend submitting your paper to it.
Suggest Journal
Missing a journal in our database? Suggest adding it below!
Send Suggestion