International Journal of Internet Science.
(University of Deusto)
First round of reviews.
Turnaround rate | 247 days (SD = 0) |
Review length | 317 words (SD = 71) |
Review quality | 4 / 5 (SD = 1) |
Overall quality | 2 / 5 (SD = 0) |
Would submit again | 1 / 5 (SD = 0) |
Journal recommendation | 1 / 5 (SD = 0) |
(based on 1 report including 2 reviews) |
|
Desk rejects. |
|
Turnaround rate | 232 days (SD = 0) |
Plausibility | 3.5 / 5 (SD = 1.5) |
(based on 2 reports) |
Reviewers & Editors (Initial Submissions)
Reviewers | |
Length | 317 words (SD = 71) |
Overall tone | Neutral (modal) |
Knowledge | 4 / 5 (SD = 1) |
Helpfulness | 4 / 5 (SD = 1) |
Fairness | 5 / 5 (SD = 0) |
Overall quality | 4 / 5 (SD = 1) |
Editors | |
Length | 327 words (SD = 0) |
Decision | Reject (modal) |
Plausibility | 4 / 5 (SD = 0) |
Helpfulness | 4 / 5 (SD = 0) |
Fairness | 4 / 5 (SD = 0) |
Overall quality | 4 / 5 (SD = 0) |
Comments
· Plausibility: 5 / 5 (desk reject)
After half I year I was informed that the editor was unable to find reviewers for the paper. As the editor credibly assured to have asked multiple researches, I assume that the reviewer capacities of the journal are quite limited.
After half I year I was informed that the editor was unable to find reviewers for the paper. As the editor credibly assured to have asked multiple researches, I assume that the reviewer capacities of the journal are quite limited.
· Plausibility: 2 / 5 (desk reject)
It took no less than 2 emails to the editor to receive any status update in the submission. Finally, I was informed that the paper was in the system as "rejected" (apparently for a while) because a similar working paper has previously been published on the Internet.
It took no less than 2 emails to the editor to receive any status update in the submission. Finally, I was informed that the paper was in the system as "rejected" (apparently for a while) because a similar working paper has previously been published on the Internet.
· Overall quality rating: 2 / 5 · Recommendation: 1 / 5
It took a series of requests to the editor to receive any status update of the review at all. There is no website to check the current status.
It took a series of requests to the editor to receive any status update of the review at all. There is no website to check the current status.
Suggest Journal
Missing a journal in our database? Suggest adding it below!
Send Suggestion