Social Psychology.

(Hogrefe)

First round of reviews.

Turnaround rate	31 days (SD = 0)
Review length	351 words (SD = 65)
Review quality	5 / 5 (SD = 0)
Overall quality	3 / 5 (SD = 0)
Would submit again	4 / 5 (SD = 0)
Journal recommendation	4 / 5 (SD = 0)
(based on 1 report including 2 reviews)
Desk rejects.
Turnaround rate	n/a
Plausibility	n/a

Reviewers & Editors (Initial Submissions)

Reviewers
Length	351 words (SD = 65)
Overall tone	Negative (modal)
Knowledge	4.5 / 5 (SD = 0.5)
Helpfulness	5 / 5 (SD = 0)
Fairness	4.5 / 5 (SD = 0.5)
Overall quality	5 / 5 (SD = 0)

Editors
Length	1766 words (SD = 0)
Decision	Revise&Resubmit (modal)
Plausibility	5 / 5 (SD = 0)
Helpfulness	5 / 5 (SD = 0)
Fairness	5 / 5 (SD = 0)
Overall quality	5 / 5 (SD = 0)

Reviewers & Editors (Successive Rounds)

Turnaround rate	82 days (SD = 0)
(based on 1 report including 2 reviews)

Reviewers
Length	375 words (SD = 129)
Overall tone	Neutral (modal)
Knowledge	3.5 / 5 (SD = 1.5)
Helpfulness	4.5 / 5 (SD = 0.5)
Fairness	4.5 / 5 (SD = 0.5)
Consistency	3.5 / 5 (SD = 1.5)
Overall quality	4 / 5 (SD = 1)

Editors
Length	1680 words (SD = 0)
Decision	Reject (modal)
Plausibility	3 / 5 (SD = 0)
Helpfulness	2 / 5 (SD = 0)
Fairness	3 / 5 (SD = 0)
Overall quality	3 / 5 (SD = 0)

Comments

· Overall quality rating: 3 / 5 · Recommendation: 4 / 5
Albeit the paper got rejected based on the inclusion of literature suggested by one of the Reviewers and due to analyses the editor had suggested, the reviews were very detailed and I think the paper will definitely benefit from considering the suggestions made.

Suggest Journal