Social Science Computer Review.
(Sage Publications)
First round of reviews.
| Turnaround rate | 54 days (SD = 0) |
| Review length | 747 words (SD = 324) |
| Review quality | 4.5 / 5 (SD = 0.5) |
| Overall quality | 5 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Would submit again | 5 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Journal recommendation | 5 / 5 (SD = 0) |
(based on 1 report including 2 reviews) |
|
Desk rejects. |
|
| Turnaround rate | n/a |
| Plausibility | n/a |
Reviewers & Editors (Initial Submissions)
| Reviewers | |
| Length | 747 words (SD = 324) |
| Overall tone | Positive (modal) |
| Knowledge | 4 / 5 (SD = 1) |
| Helpfulness | 4 / 5 (SD = 1) |
| Fairness | 5 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Overall quality | 4.5 / 5 (SD = 0.5) |
| Editors | |
| Length | 352 words (SD = 0) |
| Decision | Minor Revision (modal) |
| Plausibility | 5 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Helpfulness | 4 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Fairness | 5 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Overall quality | 4 / 5 (SD = 0) |
Comments
· Overall quality rating: 5 / 5 · Recommendation: 5 / 5
Both reviewers were very positive. Both suggested acceptance with minor revisions, and those revisions were really good suggestions. One of the reviewers wanted to see an additional analysis, which I conducted and which really improved the paper. I was highly satisfied with the whole process.
Both reviewers were very positive. Both suggested acceptance with minor revisions, and those revisions were really good suggestions. One of the reviewers wanted to see an additional analysis, which I conducted and which really improved the paper. I was highly satisfied with the whole process.
Suggest Journal
Missing a journal in our database? Suggest adding it below!
Send Suggestion