Social Science Computer Review.
(Sage Publications)
First round of reviews.
| Turnaround rate | 114 days (SD = 60) |
| Review length | 1034 words (SD = 485) |
| Review quality | 4.7 / 5 (SD = 0.5) |
| Overall quality | 4 / 5 (SD = 1) |
| Would submit again | 3.5 / 5 (SD = 1.5) |
| Journal recommendation | 3.5 / 5 (SD = 1.5) |
(based on 2 reports including 3 reviews) |
|
Desk rejects. |
|
| Turnaround rate | n/a |
| Plausibility | n/a |
Reviewers & Editors (Initial Submissions)
| Reviewers | |
| Length | 1034 words (SD = 485) |
| Overall tone | Positive (modal) |
| Knowledge | 4.3 / 5 (SD = 0.9) |
| Helpfulness | 4.3 / 5 (SD = 0.9) |
| Fairness | 5 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Overall quality | 4.7 / 5 (SD = 0.5) |
| Editors | |
| Length | 223 words (SD = 130) |
| Decision | Minor Revision (modal) |
| Plausibility | 4.5 / 5 (SD = 0.5) |
| Helpfulness | 4 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Fairness | 5 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Overall quality | 4.5 / 5 (SD = 0.5) |
Comments
· Overall quality rating: 3 / 5 · Recommendation: 2 / 5
The journal took 3 months to find reviewers for our manuscript and a total of over 5 and a half months from submission until we received a decision with only 1 review. Nevertheless, the review we received was very helpful, fair, detailed and of high quality.
The journal took 3 months to find reviewers for our manuscript and a total of over 5 and a half months from submission until we received a decision with only 1 review. Nevertheless, the review we received was very helpful, fair, detailed and of high quality.
· Overall quality rating: 5 / 5 · Recommendation: 5 / 5
Both reviewers were very positive. Both suggested acceptance with minor revisions, and those revisions were really good suggestions. One of the reviewers wanted to see an additional analysis, which I conducted and which really improved the paper. I was highly satisfied with the whole process.
Both reviewers were very positive. Both suggested acceptance with minor revisions, and those revisions were really good suggestions. One of the reviewers wanted to see an additional analysis, which I conducted and which really improved the paper. I was highly satisfied with the whole process.
Suggest Journal
Missing a journal in our database? Suggest adding it below!
Send Suggestion