JournalReviewer 

Studies in Communication | Media.

(Nomos)

First round of reviews.

Turnaround rate 119 days (SD = 0)
Review length 937 words (SD = 0)
Review quality 2 / 5 (SD = 0)
Overall quality 1 / 5 (SD = 0)
Would submit again 2 / 5 (SD = 0)
Journal recommendation 3 / 5 (SD = 0)
(based on 1 report including 1 review)

Desk rejects.

Turnaround rate n/a
Plausibility n/a


Reviewers & Editors (Initial Submissions)
Reviewers
Length 937 words (SD = 0)
Overall tone Negative (modal)
Knowledge 3 / 5 (SD = 0)
Helpfulness 1 / 5 (SD = 0)
Fairness 2 / 5 (SD = 0)
Overall quality 2 / 5 (SD = 0)
Editors
Length 91 words (SD = 0)
Decision Reject (modal)
Plausibility 3 / 5 (SD = 0)
Helpfulness 1 / 5 (SD = 0)
Fairness 3 / 5 (SD = 0)
Overall quality 3 / 5 (SD = 0)
Comments
  ·  Overall quality rating: 1 / 5  ·  Recommendation: 3 / 5
It's very hard to write a comment here, especially since it is anonymous and I definitely I don't want to pillory anybody. I do believe everybody has their own reasons to write reviews as they do. However, this review has personally crossed my boarders. The tone has been very rude, the wording has been more than personal and the publisher refused to get a second opinion. It's very unfortunate and I don't want to go into any detail. All I'd like to say is be aware when you submit to this journal, that there is a chance that the review might not be helpful.





Suggest Journal

Missing a journal in our database? Suggest adding it below!