Journal of Youth and Adolescence.

(Springer)

First round of reviews.

Turnaround rate	57 days (SD = 32)
Review length	586 words (SD = 0)
Review quality	4.3 / 5 (SD = 0.5)
Overall quality	4 / 5 (SD = 1)
Would submit again	4 / 5 (SD = 1)
Journal recommendation	4 / 5 (SD = 1)
(based on 2 reports including 3 reviews)
Desk rejects.
Turnaround rate	n/a
Plausibility	n/a

Reviewers & Editors (Initial Submissions)

Reviewers
Length	586 words (SD = 0)
Overall tone	Neutral (modal)
Knowledge	4 / 5 (SD = 0)
Helpfulness	4.3 / 5 (SD = 0.5)
Fairness	4.7 / 5 (SD = 0.5)
Overall quality	4.3 / 5 (SD = 0.5)

Editors
Length	498 words (SD = 0)
Decision	Major Revision (modal)
Plausibility	4.5 / 5 (SD = 0.5)
Helpfulness	4 / 5 (SD = 1)
Fairness	5 / 5 (SD = 0)
Overall quality	4 / 5 (SD = 1)

Reviewers & Editors (Successive Rounds)

Turnaround rate	3 days (SD = 0)
(based on 1 report including 1 review)

Reviewers
Length	n/a
Overall tone	Neutral (modal)
Knowledge	n/a
Helpfulness	n/a
Fairness	n/a
Consistency	n/a
Overall quality	n/a

Editors
Length	n/a
Decision	Minor Revision (modal)
Plausibility	5 / 5 (SD = 0)
Helpfulness	5 / 5 (SD = 0)
Fairness	5 / 5 (SD = 0)
Overall quality	5 / 5 (SD = 0)

Comments

· Overall quality rating: 3 / 5 · Recommendation: 3 / 5
The 2nd reviewer clearly had no expertise in my area. They said they "googled" some of the terms I used, but couldn't find them, so I must be using the wrong terms. These were terms used commonly in my field.

Suggest Journal