Visual Communication Quarterly.
(Taylor & Francis)
First round of reviews.
| Turnaround rate | 166 days (SD = 0) |
| Review length | 751 words (SD = 187) |
| Review quality | 4 / 5 (SD = 1) |
| Overall quality | 2 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Would submit again | 1 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Journal recommendation | 1 / 5 (SD = 0) |
(based on 1 report including 2 reviews) |
|
Desk rejects. |
|
| Turnaround rate | n/a |
| Plausibility | n/a |
Reviewers & Editors (Initial Submissions)
| Reviewers | |
| Length | 751 words (SD = 187) |
| Overall tone | Neutral (modal) |
| Knowledge | 3.5 / 5 (SD = 0.5) |
| Helpfulness | 4 / 5 (SD = 1) |
| Fairness | 4 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Overall quality | 4 / 5 (SD = 1) |
| Editors | |
| Length | 174 words (SD = 0) |
| Decision | Reject (modal) |
| Plausibility | 4 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Helpfulness | 1 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Fairness | 3 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Overall quality | 2 / 5 (SD = 0) |
Comments
· Overall quality rating: 2 / 5 · Recommendation: 1 / 5
Five hundred thirty-one days. We contacted the editor multiple times within this window, and the editor was always friendly, and mentioned that the journal was still waiting on an outstanding review. In the end, we received two. Two reviews.
The reviews were fine, and slightly exceeded my expectations. But 531 days is an excessively large number of days.
Five hundred thirty-one days. We contacted the editor multiple times within this window, and the editor was always friendly, and mentioned that the journal was still waiting on an outstanding review. In the end, we received two. Two reviews.
The reviews were fine, and slightly exceeded my expectations. But 531 days is an excessively large number of days.
Suggest Journal
Missing a journal in our database? Suggest adding it below!
Send Suggestion