Science Communication.

(Sage Publications)

First round of reviews.

Turnaround rate	n/a
Review length	n/a
Review quality	4.3 / 5 (SD = 0.5)
Overall quality	5 / 5 (SD = 0)
Would submit again	5 / 5 (SD = 0)
Journal recommendation	5 / 5 (SD = 0)
(based on 1 report including 3 reviews)
Desk rejects.
Turnaround rate	n/a
Plausibility	n/a

Reviewers & Editors (Initial Submissions)

Reviewers
Length	n/a
Overall tone	Positive (modal)
Knowledge	4.3 / 5 (SD = 0.5)
Helpfulness	4 / 5 (SD = 0)
Fairness	5 / 5 (SD = 0)
Overall quality	4.3 / 5 (SD = 0.5)

Editors
Length	n/a
Decision	Revise&Resubmit (modal)
Plausibility	4 / 5 (SD = 0)
Helpfulness	5 / 5 (SD = 0)
Fairness	5 / 5 (SD = 0)
Overall quality	5 / 5 (SD = 0)

Reviewers & Editors (Successive Rounds)

Turnaround rate	n/a
(based on 1 report including 3 reviews)

Reviewers
Length	n/a
Overall tone	Positive (modal)
Knowledge	4.5 / 5 (SD = 0.5)
Helpfulness	3.3 / 5 (SD = 1.7)
Fairness	4 / 5 (SD = 0.8)
Consistency	5 / 5 (SD = 0)
Overall quality	3.7 / 5 (SD = 1.2)

Editors
Length	n/a
Decision	Accept (modal)
Plausibility	4 / 5 (SD = 0)
Helpfulness	4 / 5 (SD = 0)
Fairness	4 / 5 (SD = 0)
Overall quality	4 / 5 (SD = 0)

Comments

· Overall quality rating: 5 / 5 · Recommendation: 5 / 5
Fair turnaround times. Helpful comments. Thorough search for reviewers. Extremely active editor. Response times could sometimes be a bit better. But overall: very good, professional peer review. Recommendable.

Suggest Journal