Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising.
(Routledge)
First round of reviews.
| Turnaround rate | 87 days (SD = 0) |
| Review length | n/a |
| Review quality | 1 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Overall quality | 1 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Would submit again | 1 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Journal recommendation | 1 / 5 (SD = 0) |
(based on 1 report including 1 review) |
|
Desk rejects. |
|
| Turnaround rate | n/a |
| Plausibility | n/a |
Reviewers & Editors (Initial Submissions)
| Reviewers | |
| Length | n/a |
| Overall tone | Neutral (modal) |
| Knowledge | 3 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Helpfulness | 1 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Fairness | 1 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Overall quality | 1 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Editors | |
| Length | n/a |
| Decision | Reject (modal) |
| Plausibility | 1 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Helpfulness | 1 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Fairness | 1 / 5 (SD = 0) |
| Overall quality | 1 / 5 (SD = 0) |
Comments
· Overall quality rating: 1 / 5 · Recommendation: 1 / 5
After three months of waiting, they only had one reviewer who provided comments which made it clear that he/she had not read the paper at all. For example, we provided a full table of means and SDs for all dependent variables and the reviewer complained that means and SDs should be provided. The reviewer was obviously knowledgeable about his/her own field but was not willing to remain open-minded to accept interpretations that might be different from his/hers. Most of the comments were blatant indications that the reviewer had not bothered to read through the manuscript and simply gave it a quick glance. The editor had absolutely nothing helpful to say and merely copy/pasted reviewer comments.
After three months of waiting, they only had one reviewer who provided comments which made it clear that he/she had not read the paper at all. For example, we provided a full table of means and SDs for all dependent variables and the reviewer complained that means and SDs should be provided. The reviewer was obviously knowledgeable about his/her own field but was not willing to remain open-minded to accept interpretations that might be different from his/hers. Most of the comments were blatant indications that the reviewer had not bothered to read through the manuscript and simply gave it a quick glance. The editor had absolutely nothing helpful to say and merely copy/pasted reviewer comments.
Suggest Journal
Missing a journal in our database? Suggest adding it below!
Send Suggestion