JournalReviewer 

Social Psychology.

(Hogrefe)

First round of reviews.

Turnaround rate 31 days (SD = 0)
Review length 351 words (SD = 65)
Review quality 5 / 5 (SD = 0)
Overall quality 3 / 5 (SD = 0)
Would submit again 4 / 5 (SD = 0)
Journal recommendation 4 / 5 (SD = 0)
(based on 1 report including 2 reviews)

Desk rejects.

Turnaround rate n/a
Plausibility n/a


Reviewers & Editors (Initial Submissions)
Reviewers
Length 351 words (SD = 65)
Overall tone Positive (modal)
Knowledge 4.5 / 5 (SD = 0.5)
Helpfulness 5 / 5 (SD = 0)
Fairness 4.5 / 5 (SD = 0.5)
Overall quality 5 / 5 (SD = 0)
Editors
Length 1766 words (SD = 0)
Decision Revise&Resubmit (modal)
Plausibility 5 / 5 (SD = 0)
Helpfulness 5 / 5 (SD = 0)
Fairness 5 / 5 (SD = 0)
Overall quality 5 / 5 (SD = 0)
Reviewers & Editors (Successive Rounds)
Turnaround rate 82 days (SD = 0)
(based on 1 report including 2 reviews)

Reviewers
Length 375 words (SD = 129)
Overall tone Positive (modal)
Knowledge 3.5 / 5 (SD = 1.5)
Helpfulness 4.5 / 5 (SD = 0.5)
Fairness 4.5 / 5 (SD = 0.5)
Consistency 3.5 / 5 (SD = 1.5)
Overall quality 4 / 5 (SD = 1)
Editors
Length 1680 words (SD = 0)
Decision Reject (modal)
Plausibility 3 / 5 (SD = 0)
Helpfulness 2 / 5 (SD = 0)
Fairness 3 / 5 (SD = 0)
Overall quality 3 / 5 (SD = 0)
Comments
  ·  Overall quality rating: 3 / 5  ·  Recommendation: 4 / 5
Albeit the paper got rejected based on the inclusion of literature suggested by one of the Reviewers and due to analyses the editor had suggested, the reviews were very detailed and I think the paper will definitely benefit from considering the suggestions made.





Suggest Journal

Missing a journal in our database? Suggest adding it below!