JournalReviewer 

Journal of Social & Personal Relationships.

(Sage Publications)

First round of reviews.

Turnaround rate 89 days (SD = 42)
Review length 978 words (SD = 527)
Review quality 4.8 / 5 (SD = 0.4)
Overall quality 5 / 5 (SD = 0)
Would submit again 5 / 5 (SD = 0)
Journal recommendation 5 / 5 (SD = 0)
(based on 2 reports including 5 reviews)

Desk rejects.

Turnaround rate n/a
Plausibility n/a


Reviewers & Editors (Initial Submissions)
Reviewers
Length 978 words (SD = 527)
Overall tone Neutral (modal)
Knowledge 4.8 / 5 (SD = 0.4)
Helpfulness 4.6 / 5 (SD = 0.5)
Fairness 4.8 / 5 (SD = 0.4)
Overall quality 4.8 / 5 (SD = 0.4)
Editors
Length 508 words (SD = 127)
Decision Revise&Resubmit (modal)
Plausibility 5 / 5 (SD = 0)
Helpfulness 5 / 5 (SD = 0)
Fairness 5 / 5 (SD = 0)
Overall quality 5 / 5 (SD = 0)
Reviewers & Editors (Successive Rounds)
Turnaround rate 5 days (SD = 0)
(based on 1 report including 1 review)

Reviewers
Length 1 words (SD = 0)
Overall tone Neutral (modal)
Knowledge n/a
Helpfulness n/a
Fairness n/a
Consistency n/a
Overall quality n/a
Editors
Length 188 words (SD = 0)
Decision Accept (modal)
Plausibility 5 / 5 (SD = 0)
Helpfulness 5 / 5 (SD = 0)
Fairness 5 / 5 (SD = 0)
Overall quality 5 / 5 (SD = 0)
Comments
  ·  Overall quality rating: 5 / 5  ·  Recommendation: 5 / 5
Although I was (naturally) disappointed that the paper was rejected, I was very impressed with the review and editorial process. It was clear that the reviewers had read the paper closely and thought carefully about their remarks. The tone of each review was constructive, and each of the three reviewers offered both 'big picture' and detail-oriented comments.

The editorial letter was also useful, and as supportive as a rejection letter could be.






Suggest Journal

Missing a journal in our database? Suggest adding it below!